Headline
Mastering Financial Accuracy: A Comprehensive Accounts Payable Audit for a Leading University
The client
The University of Exeter is a member of the prestigious Russell Group of research-intensive universities. It offers a wide range of subject areas in a welcoming and international environment. Situated on three different campuses in the South West of England.
Established in 1955, it has a rich history dating back to the 19th century, emerging from a collection of colleges and institutes.
Known for its academic excellence, the university consistently ranks among the top institutions in the UK and globally. It offers a broad range of undergraduate, postgraduate, and research programs across various disciplines, including business, sciences, humanities, and social sciences.
The University of Exeter is recognized for its cutting-edge research, commitment to sustainability, and vibrant student community, fostering a supportive and innovative learning environment.
The requirement
The University of Exeter commissioned Rockford Associates to undertake a totally risk free independent and impartial review of its Accounts Payable Systems and Processes to ensure no overpayments had been made to its core suppliers and to validate internal systems were working well.
The solution
Rockford Associates reviewed six years of data, extracting AP transaction data directly from their Technology One systems data. The process was simple and straight forward as no scripting or software development was required. The data was uploaded to Rockford’s secure share file site, then processed via its bespoke data mining software “Pathfinder”.
Services were procured via Crown Commercial Services (CCS) procurement compliant Framework Agreement reference RM6226.
The results
In total 472,513 transactions were analysed, 99.982% of transactions by volume and 99.995% by value were correctly processed. Of the transactions reviewed 82 exceptions were identified.
In addition to the exceptions identified the University of Exeter welcomed Rockford’s independent validation and positive reassurance that their internal controls and duplicate software processes were operating effectively and clearly within the parameters of a well-managed organisation